The State of Quality Report 2025

Table of Contents
- About the Report
- The Quality Revolution Has Begun
- Key Findings at a Glance
- The Tools Powering (and Hindering) Quality Progress
- Where Manufacturers Stand in Their Data Journey
- What’s Fueling the Push Toward Real-Time Quality
- Why the Future of Quality is Predictive
- Unlocking Quality at Scale
- Embracing the Revolution: What Comes Next
- The Solution: Real-Time SPC in Action
- Bonus Resources: Videos, Webinars, & More
About the Report
Every manufacturer wants to improve quality. But what’s actually happening on the ground floor?
To understand how manufacturers are approaching quality in 2025, we surveyed over 300 professionals in engineering, operations, quality, and manufacturing roles—from operators and managers to decision-makers at global facilities.
Our goal was simple: take the pulse of the industry. Where are teams on their quality journey? How are they tracking key metrics? What tools are making a difference? And what’s standing in the way of progress?
This report is designed to help you benchmark your own quality efforts, uncover opportunities for growth, and kickstart conversations around smarter systems and stronger outcomes.
Here's what we found:
The Quality Revolution Has Begun
A movement is underway—and it’s reshaping how quality gets done
Today, quality is no longer just about catching errors. It’s about preventing them. And not just about isolated wins, but scalable, repeatable improvement.
We call this shift the Quality Revolution—and manufacturers everywhere are starting to feel it.
Signs of the shift:
- Leaders want real-time visibility into quality metrics
- Teams are rethinking manual and paper-based systems
- There’s growing urgency around data centralization and faster feedback loops
- KPIs are defined—but too many are still chasing them reactively

Key Findings at a Glance
Here’s what jumped out from our 2025 survey results:
- 95% of manufacturers have clear KPIs for quality
- But only 27% are using real-time monitoring
- Nearly 1 in 4 teams still rely on paper or spreadsheets
- 30% use predictive analytics today
- But 52% want to
- Data is coming from everywhere, yet only 26% say it’s immediately usable
This disconnect between aspiration and reality is the core tension shaping the future of quality.
The Tools Powering (and Hindering) Quality Progress
Quality work is evolving—but tools haven’t caught up.
We asked respondents what they use today to manage quality initiatives, SPC programs, and problem-solving projects.
The results showed significant fragmentation:
- 47% use digital project management platforms (e.g., Asana, Jira)
- 25% rely on Excel, Word, or SharePoint
- 24% use internal, custom-built tools
- 2% still use paper-based methods
Even among the digital adopters, tools often aren’t integrated, automated, or scalable.
Too many teams are doing digital work with analog tools. That’s creating data blind spots, delayed responses, and process inefficiencies that stall real progress.
Where Manufacturers Stand in Their Data Journey
The data is there. But it’s messy, fragmented, and hard to use.
Manufacturers are collecting more data than ever before—but collecting it isn’t the same as leveraging it.
When we asked how teams collect data for quality monitoring, we heard:
rely on operator entry
connect to controllers
use wireless sensors
pull from cloud-connected machinery
Yet despite all this input, only 26% say their data is immediately usable.
Key roadblocks:
- Data lives in different systems
- Manual cleaning or combination is required
- Teams don’t trust the completeness or accuracy of what they’re seeing
What’s Fueling the Push Toward Real-Time Quality
Speed, pressure, and the rising cost of being too late.
What’s motivating manufacturers to improve their processes?
- 36% want to keep defect rates stable
- 23% must meet quality demands as part of a larger supply chain
- 17% are actively working to reduce defects
- 14% are focused on minimizing downtime
Quality teams aren’t just looking for improvement—they’re looking for speed. In an increasingly competitive global market, delayed decisions cost money.
These goals are difficult—if not impossible—to achieve without real-time feedback loops.
Why the Future of Quality is Predictive
Manufacturers don’t just want to react. They want to anticipate.
We asked teams if they’re using predictive analytics or machine learning in their quality efforts.
- 30% use predictive analytics today
- 52% want to—but lack training
- 12% aren’t leveraging it at all
- 6% want to—but don’t know where to begin
This tells us something important: the appetite is there. What’s missing is guidance, systems, and support.
Real-world use cases:
- Forecasting process instability
- Identifying root causes before issues spread
- Optimizing production based on historical trends
Unlocking Quality at Scale
You can’t scale quality without solving visibility.
The most advanced quality teams aren’t just making improvements in one plant or one line. They’re building repeatable, scalable systems that work across facilities and teams.
What separates them?
- Connected dashboards that aggregate data across machines and shifts
- Alerts that trigger action, not just logging
- Automations that eliminate manual data entry and reduce variability
We’ve seen that once quality systems become centralized, everything changes:
- Defects decrease
- Response times drop
- Operator trust increases
- Leaders get clearer ROI visibility
Embracing the Revolution: What Comes Next
The Quality Revolution isn't a moment. It's a movement.
The data is clear: teams are ready for better systems, faster insights, and deeper impact.
But readiness isn’t enough. What’s needed now is action—and alignment.
Here’s what quality leaders should prioritize:
- Break down data silos
- Automate data collection wherever possible
- Invest in centralized platforms
- Shift from reactive monitoring to proactive decision-making
The Tools Powering (and Hindering) Quality Progress
Quality work is evolving—but tools haven’t caught up.
We asked respondents what they use today to manage quality initiatives, SPC programs, and problem-solving projects.
The results showed significant fragmentation:
0%
47% use digital project management platforms (e.g., Asana, Jira)
0%
25% rely on Excel, Word, or SharePoint
0%
24% use internal, custom-built tools
0%
2% still use paper-based methods
Even among the digital adopters, tools often aren’t integrated, automated, or scalable.
Too many teams are doing digital work with analog tools. That’s creating data blind spots, delayed responses, and process inefficiencies that stall real progress.
Where Manufacturers Stand in Their Data Journey
The data is there. But it’s messy, fragmented, and hard to use.
Manufacturers are collecting more data than ever before—but collecting it isn’t the same as leveraging it.
When we asked how teams collect data for quality monitoring, we heard:
Yet despite all this input, only 26% say their data is immediately usable.
Key roadblocks:
- Data lives in different systems
- Manual cleaning or combination is required
- Teams don’t trust the completeness or accuracy of what they’re seeing
The future of manufacturing will be built on connected, clean, and centralized data systems. Many aren’t there yet—but they want to be.
0%
54% rely on operator entry
0%
36% use wireless sensors
0%
48% connect to controllers
0%
32% pull from cloud-connected machinery
What’s Fueling the Push Toward Real-Time Quality
Speed, pressure, and the rising cost of being too late.
Quality teams aren’t just looking for improvement—they’re looking for speed. In an increasingly competitive global market, delayed decisions cost money.
What’s motivating manufacturers to improve their processes?
0%
36% want to keep defect rates stable
0%
23% must meet quality demands as part of a larger supply chain
0%
17% are actively working to reduce defects
0%
14% are focused on minimizing downtime
These goals are difficult—if not impossible—to achieve without real-time feedback loops.
The shift toward real-time SPC isn’t just about monitoring—it’s about gaining the agility to act before problems grow.
Why the Future of Quality is Predictive
Manufacturers don’t just want to react. They want to anticipate.
We asked teams if they’re using predictive analytics or machine learning in their quality efforts.
- 30% use predictive analytics today
- 52% want to use them—but lack training
- 12% aren’t using them at all
- 6% want to—but don’t know where to begin

This tells us something important: the appetite is there. What’s missing is guidance, systems, and support.
Real-world use cases:
- Forecasting process instability
- Identifying root causes before issues spread
- Optimizing production based on historical trends
Predictive analytics can help move manufacturers from “monitoring quality” to actively shaping it.
Unlocking Quality at Scale
You can’t scale quality without solving visibility.
The most advanced quality teams aren’t just making improvements in one plant or one line. They’re building repeatable, scalable systems that work across facilities and teams.
What separates them?
Defects Decrease
Response Times Drop
Operator Trust Increases
Leaders Get Clearer ROI Visibility
If the tools work for one line—they should work for every line.
Unlocking Quality at Scale
You can’t scale quality without solving visibility.

The most advanced quality teams aren’t just making improvements in one plant or one line. They’re building repeatable, scalable systems that work across facilities and teams.
What separates them?
What separates them?
- Connected dashboards that aggregate data across machines and shifts
- Alerts that trigger action, not just logging
- Automations that eliminate manual data entry and reduce variability
We’ve seen that once quality systems become centralized, everything changes:
- Defects decrease
- Response times drop
- Operator trust increases
- Leaders get clearer ROI visibility
If the tools work for one line—they should work for every line.

Embracing the Revolution: What Comes Next
The Quality Revolution isn’t a moment. It’s a movement.
The data is clear: teams are ready for better systems, faster insights, and deeper impact.
But readiness isn’t enough. What’s needed now is action—and alignment.
Here’s what quality leaders should prioritize:
- Break down data silos
- Automate data collection wherever possible
- Invest in centralized platforms
- Shift from reactive monitoring to proactive decision-making
The Solution: Real-Time SPC in Action
Introducing Minitab Real-Time SPC
Minitab Real-Time SPC gives you:
- Live dashboards that monitor every line
- Automated alerts when control limits are breached
- A centralized hub for plant-wide visibility
- Seamless integration with your existing equipment and databases
Perfect for:
- Reducing waste
- Meeting supplier quality agreements
- Minimizing downtime
- Scaling improvement across sites
It’s not just SPC. It’s visibility, accountability, and improvement—built into every shift.
The Solution: Real-Time SPC in Action
Introducing Minitab Real-Time SPC
Minitab Real-Time SPC gives you:
- Live dashboards that monitor every line
- Automated alerts when control limits are breached
- A centralized hub for plant-wide visibility
- Seamless integration with your existing equipment and databases
Perfect for:
- Reducing waste
- Meeting supplier quality agreements
- Minimizing downtime
- Scaling improvement across sites
It’s not just SPC. It’s visibility, accountability, and improvement—built into every shift.